Meaning Of The Term "Corruption Offense" As A Feature Of The Public Prosecutor's Supervision Over The Legislation On The Corruption Counteraction In The Municipal Governments Execution

Journal Issue:

Author Information: 

Senior Assistant to the Dolinsky City Prosecutor of the Sakhalin Region, Candidate for Ph.D. (Law) at the Academy of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation

Abstract: 

In the present article theoretical and practical aspects of the corruption offense definition, which are being characteristic features of the methodology of prosecutorial supervision over the legislation on counteraction to corruption in local government are analyzed. Federal Law of Jan. 17, 1992 No. 2202-1 "On the Procuracy of the Russian Federation" (Article 21) establishes the public prosecutor's supervision over the legislation on combating corruption in local government execution, which is a special sub-cluster. On general terms of theoretical techniques of the prosecutor's supervision, taking into account its specific and complex nature of corruption prosecutors based activities in this area. Author emphasizes attention on characteristics of the corruption offense, as well as aspects of legal responsibility, which lie in the fact that it is applied in accordance with law to offender as measures of state coercion of personal, financial or organizational nature for the offense committed; responsibilities of the person, who committed the offense, to be subject to measures of state coercion. In the conclusion author notes that specifics of corruption offenses that are subject of prosecutorial supervision over the execution of legislation on combating corruption in local government is determined by the special status of the offense subjects, as well as the content of legal prohibitions and legal responsibilities in the field of ​​anti-corruption at the municipal level.

Keywords: 

corruption, offense, crime, technique of the public prosecutor's supervision, corruption counteraction, responsibility, powers of the prosecutor, municipal governments, safety.

REFERENCES: 

[1] Anaeva E.A. Prokurorsko-nadzornyj process: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya / E.A. Anaeva // Voprosy ekonomiki i prava. 2011. № 5.
[2] Belyaev V.P. Processualnaya forma nadzora: osobennosti, priznaki i principy / V.P. Belyaev // Gosudarstvennyj Sovetnik. 2013. № 4.
[3] Vinokurov Yu.E. Prokurorskij nadzor: Uchebnik. M.: Vysshee obrazovanie. 2005.
[4] Kozlov T.L. Vyyavlenie narushenij zakonodatelstva o protivodejstvii korrupcii sredstvami prokurorskogo nadzora: metodicheskie rekomendacii. M.: Akademiya Generalnoj prokuratury Rossijskoj Federacii, 2012.
[5] Klochkov V.V. Aktualnye problemy teorii zakonnosti i prokurorskogo nadzora: monografiya. M., 2012, URL: http://www.agprf.org/nii/2012/2012-06
[6] Knyazeva E.G. K voprosu o prokurorsko-nadzornom processe [Elektronnyj resurs] // Rossijskij sledovatel. 2014. № 3.